Apr 262017
 

(Blue and red arrows added by SBK) Graph is figure 1 from Fleischmann, Martin and Pons, Stanley, “Calorimetry of the Pd-D2O System; From Simplicity Via Complications to Simplicity,” Physics Letters A , 176, p. 118, (1993) (Similar paper)

Kirk Shanahan is a physical chemist employed by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River National Laboratory. As this Freedom of Information Act request response shows, he spends a large amount of time attempting to discredit low-energy nuclear reaction research claims.

I published the graph above in my recent White Paper “Power Generation Via LENRs.” I received a response regarding the graph from Einar Tennfors, a retired Swedish plasma physicist. He claimed that the anomaly shown in the graph, an increase in LENR cell temperature concurrent with a decrease in input power, was easily explained by conventional science.

Tennfors said the temperature rise was due to increased conductivity in the cell. I asked him what causes the cell conductivity to increase. He said ion mobility increases with temperature. I asked him what causes the temperature rise that causes the ion mobility to increase. He said the heating is due to the interaction between the ion current and the surrounding ions.

I decided to seek a critic who could attempt a better argument. Shanahan was the man.

Continue reading »

Mar 132017
 

Japan Funding LENR Research
March 13, 2017 – By Steven B. Krivit –

A Japanese government Web site confirms that two of Japan’s largest automobile manufacturers are participating in the government’s multi-year low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR) research program, first reported by New Energy Times in 2015.

The New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), a Japanese government research and development agency, operates the Web site. LENR advocate Jed Rothwell, who speaks Japanese, found the Web page with the update today. (PDF Archive)

Japan is the first nation in two decades to make a substantial commitment to this research, which offers vast, unexplored opportunities in energy and materials science.

The participants in the government-sponsored program include Technova, a member of the Toyota Motor Corp. family of businesses, Nissan Motor Co., and four universities, Tohoku, Kyushu, Nagoya and Kobe.

Meanwhile, progress in LENR research in the U.S. has been delayed, the result of a lingering stigma created by science authorities tasked by the U.S. Department of Energy who, in March and April 1989, bet against confirmation of a new nuclear process, as explained in the 2016 book Hacking the Atom.

When confirmatory experimental results were reported in the summer of 1989, some people in the government science establishment went to great lengths to ignore and dismiss the data. The 2016 book Fusion Fiasco explains precisely and for the first time how this scientific cover-up happened and who was responsible.

 

______________________________________________________________
Questions? Comments? Submit a Letter to the Editor.

Feb 232017
 

Power Generation Through LENRs: Prospects, Problems and Paths Forward
A White Paper by Steven B. Krivit
Copyright © 2017 S.B. Krivit — All Rights Reserved
Feb. 23, 2017

Introduction

For the past 100 years, most scientists thought that nuclear reactions could occur only in high-energy physics experiments and in massive nuclear reactors. But experimental research, and the Widom-Larsen theory, suggest that there is more to know: Nuclear reactions can also occur in small, benchtop experiments. Low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR) research has the potential to open the door to a new kind of nuclear power generation without harmful radiation emission, greenhouse gas production, or the possibility of runaway chain reactions.

The Widom-Larsen theory, which does not require any new physics, provides a sensible, mathematically rigorous explanation for most of the previously incomprehensible experimental observations. A complete list of the Widom-Larsen papers, including critique and response to critique, are available on this Web page. A brief summary of the seven papers is available on request.

LENRs are neither fusion nor fission but instead provide a third potential pathway to nuclear energy. LENRs may also provide a means of transmuting elements, including rendering dangerous radioactive isotopes inert. LENR fuels may consist of ordinary hydrogen, along with metallic nanoparticles composed of nickel, titanium, palladium, other transition metals, or tungsten. At first glance, a clean, radiation-free nuclear energy technology sounds too good to be true; this concern has been one of the impediments to broader acceptance of LENRs. This paper outlines key evidence that establishes the scientific validity of LENRs, identifies issues interfering with its acceptance, and discusses future opportunities in LENR research.

Contents

Heat Sources
Nuclear Evidence: Shifts in Isotopic Abundances
Nuclear Evidence: LENR Transmutations
Nuclear Evidence: Small Emissions of Low-Energy Neutrons
LENR Power: Good Science
LENR Power: Poorly Reproducible
LENR Power: Bad News
The State of the Art
Three Impediments: Human Issues
Paths Forward
Opportunities

Download

 

Jan 272017
 

Jan. 27, 2017 – By Steven B. Krivit –

Control room monitors at Joint European Torus (Photo: S.B. Krivit)

Control room monitors for Joint European Torus (Photo: S. B. Krivit)

The U.K. government intends to leave Euratom, the European atomic energy community, putting in jeopardy fusion research in the U.K., an article on the Financial Times of London Web site reported Jan. 26.

“Membership of Euratom,” the Times reported, “is also a condition for Britain hosting what is currently the largest nuclear fusion experiment in the world.”

New construction on conventional fission reactors may also be affected.

Scientists are shocked and angry at the government’s surprise decision, according to a Jan. 27 article on the Nature Web site. Energy specialists quoted in a Jan. 27 article on The Guardian Web site said, “There doesn’t seem to have been any real explanation” for the decision.

“Ditching Euratom also implies pulling out of its research and development wing, most of which is focused on the massive ITER nuclear fusion project under construction in France,” a Jan. 26 article on Politico reported.

On Jan. 12, New Energy Times reported that ITER had been sold to the public and elected officials on a misrepresentation of fusion results from the U.K. Joint European Torus reactor. Input power to the “record-setting” 1997 fusion experiment was not, as generally reported, 24 million Watts. Instead, it was 700 million Watts.

______________________________________________________________
Questions? Comments? Submit a Letter to the Editor.

© 2024 newenergytimes.net