sbkrivit

Nov 122011
 

[Thanks to KHM and PT for translation improvement]

Source: Radio Sweden

Ny Teknik alone against the world

The idea that we will one day be able to provide us with cheap, simple and green energy is an eternal dream. Now two Italians say that they have found a solution, they have developed the ultimate perpetual motion machine. It’s just that no one is allowed to look into it. And no outsider may test if it really works. Science Journalists are skeptical and many warning bells are ringing. For example, the main character has a fake degree from Kensington University, and the findings have not been published in a scientific journal but only on Rossi’s own page. Almost all media have for this reason chosen not to pay this alleged invention any more attention. But there is one exception. Ny Teknik (New Technology) in Sweden has in the past year written over 20 articles on Andrea Rossi’s stunning gizmo – and now the newspaper is accused of advertising a scam.

Tanken att vi en dag ska kunna försörja oss med billig, enkel och grön energi är en evig dröm. Nu påstår två italienare att dom har hittat en lösning, dom har utvecklat den ultimata evighetsmaskinen. Det är bara det att ingen får titta i den. Och ingen utifrån får testa om den verkligen fungerar. Vetenskapsjournalisterna är skeptiska och egentligen ringer många varningsklockor. T ex att huvudpersonen har en bluffexamen från Kensington University, och att fynden inte har publicerats i någon vetenskaplig tidskrift utan bara på Rossis egen sida. Nästan alla medier har av den anledningen valt att inte ägna den här påstådda uppfinningen någon större uppmärksamhet. Men det finns ett undantag. Ny Teknik i Sverige har det senaste året skrivit över 20 artiklar om Andrea Rossis makalösa manick – och nu anklagas tidningen för att marknadsföra en bluff.

Nov 122011
 

On Nov. 2, John Brandon published a story on Andrea Rossi and his claim of an “energy catalyzer” on Fox News.

Brandon speculated, based on what he read on Sterling Allan’s free energy blog, that U.S. Navy’s Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego was Rossi’s mysterious customer and that they measured and verified Rossi’s test.

On Nov. 9, I asked James Fallin, the director of public affairs at SPAWAR San Diego, “is there any truth to the suggestion published on Fox News that SPAWAR is, or is considering purchasing any device from Andrea Rossi?”

“No truth at all,” Fallin wrote.

On Nov. 11, Mark Gibbs, writing for Forbes.com, wrote that Craig Brown, who operates the Free Energy Truth Web site, claimed that Rossi’s “first” customer was Austin, Texas, based National Instruments Corp.

Gibbs checked with National Instruments. According to John Pasquarette, Vice President of Corporate Marketing and eBusiness, National Instruments did not purchase a 1 MW cold fusion plant from Rossi.

Sander Olson, a writer for Next Big Future, contacted me yesterday about the SPAWAR rumor.

“After having read your articles on E-CAT and receiving independent confirmation from SPAWAR that they are not taking possession of any device from Rossi,” Olson wrote, “I have decided that he is almost certainly a fraud and [I] will not pursue an interview. I always suspected that he was a fraud and I now find the evidence overwhelming. Thank you for providing assistance in this matter.”

Nevertheless, Brian Wang, the owner of the Next Big Future Web site, published a story today promoting Rossi’s alleged technology.

“Leonardo Corporation is offering one megawatt E-Cat plants for sale, that are capable of producing hot water, or low temperature steam,” Wang wrote.

[Added: 17:04h. Source: Next Big Future. Author: Brian Wang. “I will continue to report on this even if it is a fraud, because it is still news that there is large scale technical fraud. So if it is true it is news and if it is fake it is news. You are free to ignore the posts. I agree that there is plenty of weird things going on with Rossi. I find the other [people] who are working in the field to be far more credible, but Rossi is out front and has the biggest news making activity. It is a circus high wire act without a net. It is news when they are on the high wire and it will be news when or if they fall off.”]

Nov 112011
 

[Background Information and Link to Rossi – E-Cat Timeline Page]

New Energy Times reader Alain De Carolis brought the following Nov. 5 announcement from the University of Bologna to my attention today:

***************
E-cat: l’Università di Bologna non è coinvolta

5 novembre 2011

La precisazione dell’Ateneo in merito agli esperimenti condotti dalla società Leonardo Corp.

L’Università di Bologna -in riferimento al servizio pubblicato su FoxNews.com  e a diversi articoli usciti nelle ultime settimane – precisa di non essere coinvolta negli esperimenti sull’E-Cat condotti dalla società Leonardo Corp. di proprietà di Andrea Rossi.

L’Ateneo precisa inoltre che:

1) nessun esperimento relativo all’E-Cat si è svolto presso l’Università di Bologna né il 28 ottobre 2011, né in date precedenti, né è stato condotto da ricercatori dell’Università;

2) l’Università di Bologna (Dipartimento di Fisica) è pronta a svolgere esperimenti sull’apparato E-Cat non appena il contratto siglato con la EFA SrL (la società italiana di Andrea Rossi) sarà reso attivo: a questo scopo erano presenti agli esperimenti, in qualità di osservatori, i ricercatori dell’Università di Bologna.
***************

De Carolis provided me with a translation, but his translation included the statement “no E-Cat experiments (not on October 28th nor in any previous occasion) have ever been performed inside any of the University of Bologna facilities nor by any of the University of Bologna researchers.”

I knew that none of the experiments had ever been conducted at the University. But I thought the University’s denial that its professors were involved was De Carolis’ translation error.

I telephoned Simona Storchi, the public relations officer for the University. She told me that she had an English version of the press release available.

This is what she sent to me:

***************
Data: 05 novembre 2011 10.01.45 GMT+01.00
A: Ufficio Stampa Alma Mater <ufficiostampa@unibo.it<mailto:ufficiostampa@unibo.it>>
Oggetto: PRESS RELEASE – E-CAT: UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA IS NOT INVOLVED
E-CAT: UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA IS NOT INVOLVED

The clarification about the experiments conducted by Leonardo Corp.

Bologna, 5th November 2011 – The University of Bologna ­ called upon by FoxNews.com<http://FoxNews.com> (http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/11/02/andrea-rossi-italian-cold-fusion-plant/?test=faces) and by many other news published during the past few week – states that is not involved on E-Cat experiments conducted by Leonardo Corp., the company owned by Andrea Rossi.

The University of Bologna stresses also that: 1) none of the experiments made with E-Cat (including that of 28th October 2011) has been carried out at the University of Bologna or by any of its scientists; 2) the University of Bologna (Department of Physics) is ready to carry out direct experiments on the E-Cat as soon as the contract signed with EFA Srl (Andrea Rossi’s Italian company) will be put in effect: this is the only reason why the University of Bologna researchers attended as observers to E-Cat experiments. The University of Bologna is carefully following the situation development.
***************

According to what Storchi told me on the phone, the statement was written by Dario Braga, the vice president for research and Paolo Capiluppi, the head of the physics department.

As the abundance of technical reports, news stories, photographs and videos show, University of Bologna professors Giuseppe Levi, David Bianchini and Mauro Villa have been intimately involved in the promotion and testing of Andrea Rossi’s E-Cat experiments.

(Click image below to go to page with active hyperlinks)http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/img/UNIBO-Participants.jpg

Nov 112011
 

Good dialogue with New Energy Times reader Bruce Burman today:

Burman: Great blog these days with the E-Cat stuff.  You know, if you were not pointing out this reality, the entire LENR field would look like kooky fringe pseudoscience when this is done playing out.

Krivit: Thank you Bruce.

Burman: Because you are closer to the ground floor on this stuff, what is your opinion as to the likelihood of a true LENR power device coming online over the next 15 years?

SK: That is the most common question I get and the hardest to answer. I can only guess: A small low-power device: High likelihood.

BB: Is there enough real research being done to get us there?

SK: As far as I know, and at the moment, the field does not have the forward motion it needs. So right now, no.

BB: Do the brightest minds believe it to be possible?

SK: This is the very good news. Yes, without a doubt. Strong support exists both experimentally and theoretically. Particularly with people outside the field who are not cold fusion believers, they see the possibility of weak interactions/neutron-capture LENR processes. I’m not a [paid promoter] for WLT, but I think they are light years ahead of anybody else. I have spoken with people who have taken the time and who have the capacity to understand it, and WLT seems to be a game changer.

Either Larsen needs to get going and make it happen, or somebody else has to figure out what Larsen has figured out, or improve on Larsen’s understanding, and then make it happen.

[Added, 18:00h]

BB: My big concern is we’re going to turn our planet into an other Venus with the trajectory we are on, everyone wants the perfect energy source (cheap, clean, plentiful) or nothing is going to change.

I guess I am trying to figure the odds of a game changer. Thanks for the info on Larsen I will brush up on it this weekend.

SK:
– Modern civilization is built on the assumption and expectation of a perpetual supply of cheap fossil fuel energy.
-Availability of cheap fossil fuel energy is on a gradual downward trajectory.
– Modern civilization’s consumption of energy is on a gradual upward trajectory.
– Solar doesn’t work at night and windmills doesn’t work when there is no wind.
– The idea that any large society will voluntarily and significantly reduce its energy consumption is a fantasy.
– Uranium-thorium breeder reactors can provide hundreds of years of low-waste power but we would have to build hundreds of them.
– We need no asteroid to hit the Earth to cause widespread devastation.
– Without a game-changer, we are on track for a disaster.
– There is no time for fantasies or fraud.

[Added, 20:36h]

SK: Larsen wrote one of the best overviews of LENR on Doug Natelson’s blog. Here is an excerpt:

“LENR-related phenomena have been episodically reported in mainstream scientific literature for over 100 years. In the past, most such discoveries were either written-off as experimental error or simply inexplicable anomalous phenomena — scientific curiosities with no sensible theoretical explanation. Unlike strong interaction fission and fusion, even substantial fluxes of LENRs in condensed matter do not typically produce large amounts of dangerous ‘hard’ photon or neutron radiation, or long-lived radioactive isotopes, so they could easily go unnoticed or sometimes even mimic prosaic chemical isotopic ‘fractionation’ processes — hidden in plain sight, as they say.

“All of this prior 100-year history is understandable because LENR triggering mechanisms in condensed matter systems are very subtle, depending on multistep, nanoscale, many-body, collective quantum phenomena that are very difficult to reliably replicate unless one has mastery of certain key elements of nanotechnology and plasmonics that are required to do so. Indeed, the requisite technical knowledge and related fabrication techniques in nanotech that are crucial to conducting truly productive interdisciplinary R&D programs in LENRs have only become available within the past several years — they simply didn’t exist 20 or even 10 years ago. Today, they finally do.”

Nov 102011
 

According to a slide presentation given by NASA engineer Michael A. Nelson, which New Energy Times obtained under a FOIA request, “Energy Catalyzer” inventor Andrea Rossi failed to conclusively show that his device produced excess heat from a nuclear energy source.

According to Nelson, a NASA engineer who investigates low-energy nuclear reactions and space applications, Rossi did not run his demonstration long enough to prove his extraordinary claim.

At the Sept. 22, 2011 LENR Workshop at NASA Glenn Research Center, Nelson explained that Rossi “would need to run [his experiment] for eight hours or more with a small E-Cat and much longer for an Ottoman [Fat-Cat] to rule out a chemical reaction.”

According to Nelson, it would take “three or more days for a small E-Cat, two or more weeks for an Ottoman [Fat-Cat] E-Cat and several months for a 1 MW plant.”

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/img/20110922NelsonAtGlenn-Pg12.jpg

Brian Ahern, a researcher with expertise in LENR, wrote to New Energy Times with a concise summary of the recent Oct. 28 Rossi demo:

“Rossi has been clever enough to change the trick on each successive demo. Using a secret customer is a great way to allow him to fulfill his promise to demo the 1 MW unit in October.  He  then evaded conducting the demo transparently by saying that the customer demanded the demo conditions. The “customer’ signed off when Rossi gave him the wink and he shut things down without any measurements by anyone except the shill.

“Occam’s Razor, on the other hand, says that 12 inconclusive demos in succession are not random. It is well planned and orchestrated. He has used the journalists like a team of puppets.”

© 2025 newenergytimes.net