Princeton University Press Release Excerpt:
Princeton University has agreed to reimburse $1 million to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) following a report by the DOE inspector general (IG) on a program at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) under which employees were assigned to work for extended periods of time at other U.S. laboratories engaged in fusion energy research. The University manages PPPL under a contract with the DOE.
May 21, 2012 – By Steven B. Krivit –
Summary Excerpts from Lewis Larsen’s Text:
– Outlines a hypothetical Widom-Larsen Theory LENR neutron-catalyzed transmutation network that produces stable gold and platinum end-products from tungsten ‘seed’ scrap metal
– Presents published third-party data which strongly suggests that W–> Au precious metals production by WLT LENR transmutations has been observed in laboratory experiments dating back to the 1920s and is also operating on earth in nature.
-Hydrothermal vent systems appear to be one example of a natural environment in which LENR W –> Au networks have likely operated in the distant past as well as in the present era
– Based on published data, it appears that natural W –> Au LENR transmutations may occur in Nature both abiotically and/or perhaps even biologically with certain species of bacteria
– Speculative analysis of the potential economics of future W –> Au ‘transmutation factories’ for production of precious metals such as gold and platinum suggests that, if present relative price relationship of tungsten vs. gold and platinum were to continue into the future, ‘conversion’ of tungsten into precious metals has the potential to become a highly profitable business activity. If such processes can be scaled-up volume-wise and production costs reduced further by riding the “experience curve,” LENRs might compete with conventional mining within 10 – 15 years.
P.S. If you like rock and roll, be sure to see the last slide.
When I was 12, I swore I would never want to write a book. How times have changed. I’ve written one and edited a few others.
At the time I rejected book writing, I was watching my dad go through a grueling, angst-filled process as he wrote and self-published a book in 1974. Last year, I decided to electronically re-publish his book, The Ruling Minority 1974.
Cover of The Ruling Minority, 2nd Ed.
The inspiration for the re-publication of the book came from two significant and highly visible political protest movements that emerged in 2011. The first occurred in several nations in the Arab world. Social consciousness combined with social media gave rise to a rapid cultural awakening. Passionate activists took to the streets against oppressive regimes which abused power and treated them brutally. Some of these rebellions were successful; some were not. All were bloody.
The second movement took place in the United States. It was equally intense, but its target was less obvious. It did not hold accountable any specific person or institution. It addressed the broad inequities placed on its citizens by a specific class of people. The U.S. movement identified this class as the “1%.” The 1 percent is the small sector of the population which controls vast resources and industrial and political power in the U.S. The movement awakened the American public to the fact that it had allowed the creation of a structure, and a class, that the U.S. economic system seems to be favoring at the great expense of the rest of its citizens.
Political protests are nothing new, but this was the first time that American society had recognized and identified the 1 percent and its counterpart, the 99 percent, as well as acknowledging how the two classes developed. More precisely, it was the first time since 1974, when this book was written, slightly ahead of its time.
I am by no means an expert in economics and politics, but I am happy to share this book with any readers interested in these topics.
Stephen K. Ritter, a senior correspondent with Chemical & Engineering News, published an article on low-energy nuclear reactions today. He summarized some of the non-scientific events that took place during 2011. However, Ritter omitted to mention the fact that a LENR colloquium took place at CERN in March, an unprecedented event in the field.
Ritter also discussed LENR excess heat research, but little progress has been made in this LENR discipline for nearly a decade. Much more progress has been made in particle detection, transmutations and theory. Readers wishing to learn more about the state of the field may want to read the interview I provided for the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity or go back to my 2010 Issue #35.
“For Christ’s sake, Soddy, don’t call it transmutation. They’ll have our heads off as alchemists.”
– 1901, Sir Ernest Rutherford to his colleague, Frederick Soddy.
LENR going back one century:
The Transmutation of Hydrogen to Helium & Neon
Sir William Ramsay, J.J. Thomson, John N. Collie, Hubert S. Patterson and Irvine Masson.
The Decomposition of Tungsten to Helium
Gerald L. Wendt and Clarence E. Irion
| © 2025 newenergytimes.net |
