sbkrivit

Jan 152011
 

The buzz today is Andrea Rossi’s recent public demonstration in the Physics Department of the University of Bologna, Italy, of a nickel-hydrogen low-energy nuclear reaction device that purportedly produced excess heat.

The original nickel-hydrogen LENR research was developed by Francesco Piantelli, of Siena, Italy. Piantelli was not involved in the recent Rossi demonstration. I have visited Piantelli twice in his lab, and many of the images on the New Energy Times home page are photos I took there.

In July 2008, New Energy Times #29, I reported in great depth on the virtue of the Piantelli et al. nickel-hydrogen LENR research in two articles, Deuterium and Palladium Not Required, Piantelli-Focardi Publication and Replication Path.

I reported how the group’s papers had been published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals and how they successfully responded to challenges by skeptics at CERN, the European center for high-energy physics research. I reported how this experimental design offered liberation from palladium and deuterium. Furthermore, this type of experiment had produced far more energy (heat), not merely power, than many other LENR experiments to date.

Many American LENR researchers were skeptical, I suspect because successful Ni-H LENR technology would make their palladium-deuterium research projects irrelevant. Ni-H also, of course, disproves the hypothesis of “cold fusion,” which is bad news for some LENR researchers.

Piantelli told me that he has known for many years that this type of experiment is inexplicable by the hypothesis “cold fusion.” He is well aware of the abundant heavy- element transmutations he and his colleagues have seen.

Eventually, a few Americans quietly began asking for my assistance to make contact with Piantelli, probably because he is a hard man to reach. I do not know whether they succeeded. American Michael Melich, affiliated with the Naval Postgraduate School and with the Naval Research Laboratory, is on Rossi’s team of advisers.

For the last year or so, Rossi has been pumping the Web and rumor mill with bold claims, distributing documents with serious ambiguities, and appearing to sell a questionable energy device. This is a shame because the underlying technology and potential energy is real and important.

I have examined in scientific papers and experimental data by Piantelli, the claims of excess heat, evidence of nuclear emissions and transmutations to my satisfaction.

What has occurred now? Has Rossi developed a functional understanding of this LENR system? I think he has.

But the time-honored question to ask in all situations like this is, What is the total energy balance? Anybody who gets excited about this public demonstration without such information is vulnerable to deception. The next questions to ask are, Exactly how has the energy been measured? And by whom?

A power measurement – without the total energy balance – is virtually meaningless. Without answers to these questions, this experiment and demonstration could easily be a scam. Sadly, I have been a first-hand witness to deceptions.

The red flags with Rossi have been up for months.

In October 2010, a New Energy Times reader in Italy sent the following to me:

“I imagine you are aware that Rossi’s patent [application] has been [partially] rejected in a preliminary report by the patent examiner. Piantelli also published a new WIPO patent [application] a few months ago too.

“I wish Rossi well in his endeavors although I also feel he’s claiming as an invention merely the scaling up of Piantelli’s pioneering work. Any working devices ought to be good news for mankind regardless [of] who discovered what first. If anything works, we will all get some share of the glory (and perhaps profits?).”

Today, another New Energy Times reader in Italy sent the following to me:

“Pay close attention to Andrea Rossi; he has a dirty past. Twenty years ago he was arrested for illegal importing of gold from the Swiss.

“Not only that, but in the 1980s he was involved in a scam with industrial waste. It is a complex thing to explain, but the scam cost the Lombardy region € 25 million. He honestly does not convince me as a person, and I am not convinced about the test done at Bologna today.

“Check this link: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroldragon

“In friendship, I suggest you be careful, I smell something burning.”

According to the link, in 1995, Rossi was jailed for conspiracy to engage in tax fraud for his involvement in a business that was trading precious materials between Switzerland and Italy.

Jan 142011
 

By Steven B. Krivit

Journal of Nuclear Physics? Really?

– A web site registered in California by a secret entity.
– A “journal” that is not a journal but a blog.
– A blog name that resembles the (real) former Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics.
– A virtual “editor” comprised of a “team of scientists.”
– A “team of scientists” who’s only active participant appears to be Andrea Rossi.
– A “10 kW module reactor” that is anybody’s guess.

Record of e-mail exchange, Jan. 12, 2011:
*****
Dear Editor,
Who is the editor of JONP?
Thank you,
Steven B. Krivit
Editor, New Energy Times
*****
The editor of JONP is a team of scientists who finance the Journal.
We have no owner and we are a free association. We publish for free
all the papers that our Board Of Advisers deems scientifically valid
and we do not accept advertising to remain completely independent.
Warm regards,
JONP, The Board Of Advisers
*****
To whom am I speaking please?
Rossi?
Focardi?
*****
I am writing on behalf of the board of advisers,
Andrea Rossi
******

From the JONP Web site:

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/36img/JONP.jpg

Jan 132011
 

By Steven B. Krivit

Clayton Brown and Monica Ross of 137 Films, after announcing several months ago that their film was done, have started filming again.

The film was originally titled “The Experiment,” then retitled “The Believers.” Production was finished last fall. At the end of September, according to Brown’s blog, they tried to find buyers at Independent Film Week in New York.

In November, after they had announced that they were done filming and were editing, they asked to interview me for the film. I declined because of my lack of confidence in their understanding of this complex and convoluted topic.

In December, Brown and Ross announced that they were back on the set and filming again. In this second round, according to their Web site, they plan to interview “a cold fusion enthusiast with his own radio show and a high-school student intent on pursuing cold fusion as a career.”

The crew for “The Believers” also plans to go to a lab affiliated with the University of Missouri Life Science Business Incubator at Monsanto Place, to film researchers formerly with Omer, Israel-based Energetics Technologies, Ltd. These researchers are now affiliated with a new corporation, Energetics Technologies USA LLC.

The University of Missouri lab is championed by cold fusion proponent Rob Duncan, vice chancellor for research. Duncan is also one of the incubator’s directors. In a presentation he gave in Rome in 2009, Duncan suggested muon-catalyzed fusion as a possible explanation for “cold fusion.”

However, the energy cost for muons is far greater than the energy produced by muon-catalyzed fusion and thus cannot explain the anomalous heat produced in low-energy nuclear reactions. Furthermore, the branching ratio of muon-catalyzed fusion conflicts with that of LENR.

I met longtime cold fusion critic Richard Garwin in November, and he told me that he explained to Duncan why muon-catalyzed fusion cannot explain LENR.

“Duncan seems to believe what he wants to believe,” Garwin said.

Nov 222010
 

See this post for background on the “cold fusion” film “The Believers,” formerly titled “The Experiment,” currently in production.

For a detailed description of the film – which they say is now in post-production, click here.

***************

Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:01:25 -0800 (PST)
From: “monica ross”
Subject: interview?
To: “Steve Krivit” <

Hello Steve Krivit,

We would still very much like to include your voice in our film.  We want to cover the entire field and we know that you have had a concern about the “cold fusion” group being overly represented in our story.  We are too.  The only way for us to tell the complete story is for representatives of the different groups to go on camera to explain to the audience what is currently going on in the field.  So, we’re asking you, as a person who certainly can speak in an informed way about current theories and controversies, to represent those views in our film.

We’ve included a link to New Energy Times on our website because current thought in the field is of interest to us and our followers.  Although our budget is stretched to the limit right now, we would consider a trip to CA to do an interview if you would consent to do one.  How do you feel about that possibility?

Best,
Monica Ross
Artistic Director
137 Films

***************

Monica and Clayton,

Thank you for the invitation. After seeing your film trailers, I am convinced that you and Clayton Brown do not sufficiently understand this complex and convoluted topic to represent it accurately, with or without me. I am going to decline.

Thank you and good luck,

Steve

 

Nov 212010
 

The board of directors of New Energy Institute would like to express its deepest regret for the passing of board member Alf Thompson. Although he kept a low profile in the field, Alf was a courageous and steadfast explorer of low-energy nuclear reactions. He was an insightful and dedicated participant in our organization. We would like to express our condolences to his family. His presence on our team will certainly be missed.

Jim Newburn, Board Member
Tom Dolan, Board Member
Ron Marshall, Board Member
Steven B. Krivit, Executive Director

© 2025 newenergytimes.net