sbkrivit

Feb 212011
 

Self-described librarian Jed Rothwell, has tried, on behalf of a group of American “cold fusion” believers, to interfere with the potential publication of a college-level textbook I am planning to develop on low-energy nuclear reactions research.

Rothwell, along with scientist Edmund Storms, is an operator of the LENR-CANR.org Web site. The site has made a contribution to the field by providing access to papers that are otherwise unavailable.

On Feb. 11, at the ICCF-16 conference in Chennai, India, I announced that I recently completed editing the Wiley Encyclopedia of Nuclear Energy, which will publish in June.

I also announced my next planned project, a textbook on LENR, tentatively titled Introduction to Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions.

On Feb. 17, Rothwell copied me on an e-mail he sent to several people at Wiley publishing. He simultaneously posted the e-mail on the public Vortex-l Internet chat room.

“During this conference,” Rothwell wrote, “[Steven] Krivit (http://www.newenergytimes.com/) announced that Wiley has commissioned him to write a textbook on cold fusion. This raised some concerns among experts in the field.”

However, I said nothing about having a publisher for the textbook. Rothwell was present during my announcement and aware of this fact.

Wiley, a potential publisher of my textbook given my recent completion of the encyclopedia, did not know that I was contemplating a textbook project.

Rothwell also e-mailed additional lies to one of the Wiley editors and then posted them in the Vortex-l chat room.

“The people who wrote one of the Encyclopedia articles – Srinivasan and Storms – and others were at the conference,” Rothwell wrote. “They assumed he would ask them to contribute to the new textbook, as well. So they approached him and asked about his plans. They were disconcerted when he told them to shut up and go away. Literally.”

I called Srinivasan today and read him Rothwell’s statement.

“I will state on the record that we [Srinivasan and Krivit] had no conversation about the textbook,” Srinivasan said.

Then I called Storms and read him Rothwell’s statement. I told him that I did not recall speaking with him at all during the conference.

“I did not speak to you,” Storms said.

Storms is the author of The Science of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction: A Comprehensive Compilation of Evidence and Explanations About Cold Fusion. Its foreword says the book is the first textbook in the field.

Rothwell has been unable to see the key distinction between the reality of low-energy nuclear reactions and the mythology of “cold fusion.”

He has a longstanding history of Internet-based attacks and vendettas against people and scientific work that threatened his belief in “cold fusion.”

For example, researcher Paulo Correa depicted Rothwell accurately in his article “The Serpent’s Tooth and Its Egg (Or: How the Stupid Are So Often Malicious)” (pdf), which is a detailed analysis of Rothwell’s attacks against Correa and his wife and their scientific work.

Rothwell’s e-mails to Wiley said that “experts” were concerned about my role in the development of a planned textbook on LENR. In his e-mails, Rothwell specifically identified Storms and Michael McKubre and described David Nagel. Rothwell also has a long history of collaborating with Michael Melich.

All of these experts are longstanding advocates of the theory of “cold fusion.” Rothwell and his experts are listed below.

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/images/Rothwell-2007Anomalies8-180x250.jpg http://newenergytimes.com/v2/images/Storms-180w.JPG http://newenergytimes.com/v2/images/NagelDave180x250.jpg http://newenergytimes.com/v2/images/McKubreM-HeadshotFEB2007-byKrivit180x250.jpg http://newenergytimes.com/v2/images/Melich-DuyTran180x250.jpg
Top left to bottom right: Jed Rothwell, Edmund Storms, David Nagel, Michael McKubre, Michael Melich. (Melich photo by D. Tran. Other photos by S.B. Krivit)

Feb 202011
 

2011 Lattice Assisted Nuclear Reaction/Cold Fusion Colloquium at MIT
Science and engineering of cold fusion, also known as LANR, LENR, and CMNS.
Where: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
When: Saturday and Sunday, June 11 and 12, 2011

More Information

Feb 142011
 

I will have one more report to file on ICCF-16, but patience is requested. It will take a few days. I am now at SRM University. Workshop on LENR Biological Transmutation is tomorrow. Host professor tells me he expects 300-400 students!

Feb 122011
 

[DRAFT REPORT]

Hi folks – just a quick informal note from Mamallapuram, India.

ICCF-16 ended without fanfare though Mahadeva Srinivasan pulled off a very pleasant and well-run conference. ICCF-16 presenters spent most of Friday morning’s program talking either directly or indirectly about the Rossi device – even though Rossi didn’t attend the ICCF-16 conference.

Someone stood in front of the group a few days ago and announced a rumor that Rossi had made some business deal in Greece for a ton of money. There were no cheers from the ICCF-16 audience. The presenters who spoke here either directly or indirectly about the Rossi device – all who have no business relationship with Rossi – appeared to suggest to the group that a) they were qualified to evaluate the device b) the device might be dangerous c) they had certain insights into Rossi’s integrity.

So now it seems that the most promising theory (see last paragraph) did not originate from the ICCF community, as well, the most promising device thus far was also “not invented here.”

The next ICCF would normally follow the intercontinental rotation and go to North America for ICCF-17. But surprisingly, no American came to the conference prepared with a proposal and commitment to lead ICCF-17. People who lead these conferences enjoy great latitude for choosing the program, selecting topics, themes and, on occasion, promoting specific ideologies within the low-energy nuclear reactions research field.

This is particularly surprising because David Nagel and Michael Melich ran ICCF-14, and according to someone who was at the private meeting of International Advisory Committee, the ad-hoc group which decides on each successive conference, neither of them put forward a bid. Michael McKubre suggested that he might volunteer to run ICCF-17 but he came with no proposal. The IAC was not eager to authorize McKubre to coordinate ICCF-17 without a formal proposal and gave him until March to come up with one.

On the other hand, Sunwon Park, a chemical engineering professor with the Korean Advanced Institute of Science and Technology expressed a strong desire to host one of the next ICCF conferences and according to the person who attended the meeting, Park mentioned that he had financial support from the Korean government to help subside a future ICCF conference. There were about five Koreans who attended ICCF-16.

About 30 of us are in Mamallapuram attending a post-conference workshop on materials science issues related to LENR.  A second post-conference workshop takes place Tuesday on LENR biological transmutations.

In other LENR news today, Lewis Larsen, the originator of the Widom-Larsen LENR theory announced today that on Feb. 22, he will be issued U.S. patent #7,893,414 for a novel, high performance gamma shielding device. The patent is titled, “Apparatus and Method for Absorption of Incident Gamma Radiation and its Conversion to Outgoing Radiation at Less Penetrating, Lower Energies and Frequencies.”

© 2025 newenergytimes.net