Fusion Energy Breakthrough Scam
By Steven B. Krivit
Dec. 11, 2022 (Updated Dec. 13, 2022)
Financial Times, among others, reported Sunday “Fusion energy breakthrough by US scientists boosts clean power hopes. Net energy gain indicates technology could provide an abundant zero-carbon alternative to fossil fuels.”
Scientifically, the National Ignition Facility result is relevant and honest. But the exaggeration and misrepresentation of the result is not.
Omar A. Hurricane, chief scientist for the inertial confinement fusion program at the NIF lab, explained the facts to New Energy Times:
The total laser energy delivered to the target was 2.05 MJ and the total fusion yield was 3.15 MJ of energy. The laser pulse duration was about 9 nanoseconds long. The duration of the fusion reaction was 90 picoseconds long. Very short time-scales, obviously, which are the nature of inertial fusion systems.
Practically speaking, the result is irrelevant. The NIF device did not achieve net energy. The scientists who are promoting this result to the news media are playing word games. They use multiple definitions for the phrase “net energy.” Only the fuel pellet achieved “net energy.” This does not account for the energy required to operate the device.
The 3.15 megajoules of fusion output energy were produced at the expense of 400 megajoules of electrical input energy. A fusion device that loses 99.2 percent of the energy it consumes, in a reaction that lasts for 0.00000000009 of a second, does not indicate technology that could provide an abundant zero-carbon alternative to fossil fuels.
On Monday, CNN implied that the reactor produced a small amount of power, but too little to be practical:
“It’s about what it takes to boil 10 kettles of water,” said Jeremy Chittenden, co-director of the Centre for Inertial Fusion Studies at Imperial College in London. “In order to turn that into a power station, we need to make a larger gain in energy – we need it to be substantially more.”
The “10 kettles” represents the 3.15 megajoule output. CNN didn’t mention the 400-megajoule input. It’s a deceptive material omission, bordering on fraud.
The public promotion of this result as evidence that fusion is a potential energy solution is a scam and promotes false hope. NIF is a taxpayer-funded project that is never going to power any house. NIF is useful only to test nuclear weapons. Are there other laser fusion results that are better than NIF? No.
We have already explained the technical details but it seems that some journalists didn’t get the memo. See our reports #73, #102, #103, #104.
P.S.: Let us not forget that half of the fuel mixture required for commercial fusion reactors does not exist. Does. Not. Exist.
NIF researchers put 400 MJ of energy into the device and got out 3.15 MJ of energy. Fusion scientists have hoaxed the news media.
The NIF device created EIGHT-TENTHS OF ONE PERCENT of the energy that was put into it.
“More energy from a fusion experiment than was put in.” Pay no attention to the fact that the half of the fuel mixture required for the “near-limitless clean energy” does not exist.
